Cases 1 - 10 of 5,678
Elghembri v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, Two and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Andes
as 3:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
John B. Gomez
Respondent:
Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Valdivia v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
John Valdivia
Defendant:
Miriam Vasquez and Department of State Hospitals Coalinga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juron D. Ervin v. M. Leon et al
as 5:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Juron D. Ervin
Defendant:
M. Leon, O. Zamora-Rios, C. Romo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin TerVeer v. Cuevas Plus the People et al
as 2:2024cv04059
Petitioner:
Justin TerVeer
Respondent:
Cuevas the People and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucero Jr. v. Blaney
as 5:2024cv02865
Plaintiff:
Albert Benjamin Lucero Jr.
Defendant:
John Blaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Reif v. Gray et al
as 2:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Daniel John Reif
Defendant:
Ryan Gray, Sabrina Buis, Todd Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TerVeer v. Cuevas + the People et al
as 3:2024cv00847
Petitioner:
Justin TerVeer
Respondent:
Cuevas + the People and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Velarde et al
as 5:2024cv02782
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Latrice Carroll
Defendant:
Jennifer L. Velarde, Superior Court of Contra Costa County, Judge John C. Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
