Cases 1 - 10 of 607
Franks v. Jones
as 6:2024cv03232
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Franks
Defendant:
Mark A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Charleston County et al
as 6:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Nekeya Jones
Defendant:
Charleston County, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Wellpath LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv03133
Plaintiff:
Quarmaine Marquise Jones
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Joseph
as 9:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
Alonzo Tarell Jones
Respondent:
Warden M Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv01324
Petitioner:
Eddie Fitzgerald Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv01066
Petitioner:
Shareca Latoya Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. Ray et al
as 5:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Dwight Xavier Jones, Dwight X Jones and Dwight Jones
Defendant:
Director Patricia Ray, Captain Sweat, Officer Tamiko Greg Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Givens v. Canning et al
as 9:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Wesley L. Givens
Defendant:
Canning, Hingleton, Lt. Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Nelson, Warden
as 2:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Kemonie Lashawn Jones
Respondent:
K. Nelson, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Bunn et al
as 9:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Derrick Henderson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Bunn, Sergeant Allen, Sergeant Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
