Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Lee v. Jones
as 1:2024cv04292
Petitioner:
Kevin Mario Lee
Respondent:
Mr. Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Jones
as 1:2024cv04136
Petitioner:
Otis L Hill, Jr
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daker v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Defendant:
Counselor FNU Couch, Captain Scott Lowe, Lieutenant FNU Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Jones
as 6:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Quentin Horton
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GHOLSTON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
DEANTE GHOLSTON
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, TYRONE OLIVER, PO AHMED HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Jones
as 4:2024cv00120
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Petitioner:
Kaivon Mitchell
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
YAKENSKI STEVENS
Respondent:
JOSHUA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00138
Respondent:
Officer Porter, Brian P. Kemp, Tyrone Oliver and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. North Branch Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv01645
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones, Joshua Colonna Jones and Joshua C. Jones
Defendant:
Western Correctional Institution and North Branch Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02411
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Petitioner:
Kaivon Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
