Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Carter Kent Gorg v. Warden
as 8:2023cv01128
Petitioner:
Carter Kent Gorg
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kent Anderson v. CSP LAC Facility D Correction Officers Staff et al
as 2:2023cv04428
Plaintiff:
Kent L. Anderson
Defendant:
CSP LAC Facility D Correction Officers Staff, CO Rodriguez, T. Trenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Anderson v. County of Shasta et al
as 2:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Ryan David Anderson
Defendant:
County of Shasta, Shasta County Sheriffs Office, Tom Bosenko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danna Vongamath v. Bar Association et al
as 5:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Danna Vongamath
Defendant:
Bar Association, Don Kent, Paul Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Revoal v. Bakersfield Medical Center et al
as 1:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
William Revoal
Defendant:
Bakersfield Medical Center, Corcoran State Prison and Kent Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Smith v. Shasta County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv00877
Defendant:
Dave Kent, Van Gerwin, Shasta County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Otero
as 3:2021cv01757
Respondent:
Steven Otero
Petitioner:
Kent Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chisenhall v. San Quentin State Prison
as 3:2020cv07980
Defendant:
San Quentin State Prison
Plaintiff:
Kent David Chisenhall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
