Cases 1 - 10 of 218
Krueger v. Collier
as 5:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00417
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00418
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weigel v. Gray et al
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
James Allan Weigel
Defendant:
Lori Chambers Gray, Jason Cox and Mark Kent Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, CMC/LITMB, TDCJ Parole Release and Process Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iribhogbe v. King et al
as 4:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
Edgal Iribhogbe
Defendant:
Warden FNU King, FNU LNU, Captain FNU Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Backus v. Glassel et al
as 9:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Caterrion Backus
Defendant:
Kent Glassel, Scott W. Grimm, Caulder R. Schwarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thacker v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01073
Petitioner:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Respondent:
Governor Greg Abbott and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
