Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. K. Richardson
as 24-6397
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
K. RICHARDSON, (Lieutenant) at Sussex Complex, J. M. BRANCH, (Unit Manager/Chief of Housing and Programming) at Sussex Complex, BETH CABELL, (Head Warden) at Sussex Complex and others
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Snodgrass v. Richardson et al
as 1:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr
Defendant:
K. Richardson, J. M. Branch, Beth Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snodgrass v. Wallens Ridge State Prison
as 7:2019cv00490
Respondent:
Wallens Ridge State Prison
Petitioner:
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. S.L. Messer
as 17-6360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
S. MESSER, M. COUNTS, Inmate Hearing Officer at ROSP, C. BISHOP, C/O at ROSP and others
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Harold Clark
as 14-7671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Plaintiff:
UHURU SEKOU OBATAIYE-ALLAH
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARK, Director, DOC, GERALD K. WASHINGTON, Regional Director, R. MATHENA, Warden and others
Uhuru Obataiye-Allah v. Kevin Snodgrass, Jr.
as 14-7213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UHURU SEKOU OBATAIYE-ALLAH
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR., HAROLD W. CLARK, Director, DOC, GERALD K. WASHINGTON, Regional Director and others
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Wilson
as 10-6061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HALL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARTIN and others
Snodgrass v. Wilson et al
as 1:2009cv00745
Plaintiff:
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr.
Defendant:
Wilson, Hall, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
