Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Enochs v. Hains et al
as 1:2023cv15015
Plaintiff:
Damarques Debronte Enochs
Defendant:
Ron Hains, Kul Sood, Roechelle Stockman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Sood et al
as 1:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Odell L. Calvin and Julius Jones
Defendant:
Kul Sood and Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Sood et al
as 1:2021cv05294
Plaintiff:
Dakir Pickens
Defendant:
Dr. Kul Sood, David Gomez, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv04225
Defendant:
John Joe, J Johnson, Bautista and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brent, et al. vs. Wexford, et al.
as 1:2019cv01212
Defendant:
Alfonso David, Andrew Tilden, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joe N Sherrod, Michael Brent, John Theis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter, et al. vs. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al.
as 3:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Alfonso David, Sherri Lynn, Michael Puisis and others
Plaintiff:
Leander Carter and Nicholas Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corbbins v. Hansen et al
as 1:2019cv01013
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen, Kul Sood and Wexford Health Sources, Inc
Plaintiff:
Christopher Corbbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balal Hardaway v. Sara Faetanini, et al
as 18-1957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BALAL HARDAWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SARA FAETANINI, KUL SOOD, Doctor, STEPHEN RITZ, Corporate Utilization Manager, Medical Director and others
Damon Goodloe v. Kul Sood, et al
as 18-1910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON GOODLOE
Defendant - Appellee:
KUL SOOD, Doctor, PAMELA A. BLOOMFIELD, RUTH A. BROWN and others
Jovan Battle v. State of Illinois, et al
as 18-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, JOHN DOE, Sgt.(3-11 shift), RANDY PFISTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
