Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00250
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Veteto v. Clerks, Judges and Justices of Alabama Courts et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00689
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Veteto
Defendant:
Clerks, Judges and Justices of Alabama Courts, Gregory O. Griffin, Lyn Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Jackson et al
as 7:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Otis Thompson
Defendant:
Billy Jackson, Missy Homan-Hibbett, John H Wilkerson, Jr and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. Thomason
as 1:2011cv00349
Petitioner:
Glynis Bethel
Respondent:
Michelle M. Thomason, Luther Strange, William E. Scully, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaeffer Coleman v. State of Alabama, et al
as 11-11585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAEFFER COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, J. LAIRD, Circuit Court Judge, ROBIN DENISE SCALES, Assistant District Attorney, Assistant Attorney General and others
Alverson v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00526
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Bill Gates, State of Alabama, The and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Shaeffer Coleman
Defendant:
State of Alabama, J. Laird, Robin D. Scales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.