Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Lucas v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lucas
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Peter F. Nerhona, Wing Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vilbon v. Department of Children, Youth and Families et al
as 1:2021cv00267
Petitioner:
Carline Vilbon
Respondent:
Residential Services for the Rumford House, The Lifespan Facilities, Department of Children, Youth and Families and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lucas v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv00178
Defendant:
Edward Blanchette, Wing Chau, Daniel W. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jaye v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
United States, US Attorney General Merrick Brian Garland, County of Union and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Ann Jaye
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Pena v. Forgue, et al
as 1:2019cv00542
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Rui Diniz, Lieutenant Moe, Counselor Joslyn and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00545
Defendant:
John Doe Grand Jurors, William J. Ferland, Garrett S. Hassett and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mondrez Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00348
Plaintiff:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Defendant:
Jonathan Horton, M 4307 Nelligan, David D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Respondent:
Ronald D Vitiello, M 4307 Nelligan, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robinson v. Semple et al
as 1:2014cv00554
Plaintiff:
Shawn Robinson
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Ashbel T. Wall, II, James Weeden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Kevin Taylor
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Lt. Burge and C/O Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
