Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Khan v. Hunt
as 5:2024cv03903
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Defendant:
Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Perez Pantoja et al
as 5:2024cv03904
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Defendant:
Isidro Perez Pantoja, J. Gonzalez and Warden Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Presley et al
as 5:2024cv03905
Defendant:
Jenee Reed, M. Botello, D. Metcalf and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Stricklin et al
as 5:2024cv00717
Defendant:
Jenee Reed, Robin Stricklin, Sean Tumacder and others
Plaintiff:
Khan Muhammad and Muhammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Madsen et al
as 5:2023cv06141
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Defendant:
Haley Madsen, Arlene Stephens, J. A. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khan v. Broomfield
as 3:2023cv05249
Petitioner:
Mohammed Zarin Khan
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) George v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Louis George, Jr.
Defendant:
A. Lopez, C. Lor, Eniola Oguntuase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tamrat v. CA Health Care Facility-Administration et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Herman Tamrat
Defendant:
California Health Care Facility-Administration, Chief Medical Office Doe, D. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Daly City Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
David Khan
Defendant:
Daly City Police Department, Jose Ortega, Jr., Michael Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Daly City Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv04064
Plaintiff:
David Khan
Defendant:
Daly City Police Department, Jose Ortega, Charles Baroni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
