Cases 1 - 10 of 43
WERTZ v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
KURT WERTZ
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2023cv00263
Petitioner:
KURT JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JOHNSON v. DOE #1 et al
as 2:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
KURT JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and Z. COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Clinton v. Earnst et al
as 3:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
Kevin Clinton
Defendant:
Kurt Earnst, Craig Braje and St Joseph County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. WEXFORD et al
as 2:2022cv00481
Plaintiff:
DENON TAYLOR
Defendant:
WEXFORD, SAMUEL BYRD and KURT MADSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WERTZ v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00273
Petitioner:
KURT WERTZ
Respondent:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR STATE OF IN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WERTZ v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2022cv00255
Petitioner:
KURT WERTZ
Respondent:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banter v. Adams County et al
as 1:2021cv00400
Plaintiff:
Kurt Edward Banter
Defendant:
Adams County ET:All, Jack Odle, Tracy Netzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEMP v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2021cv01221
Petitioner:
KURT J. KEMP
Respondent:
SEVIER and THEODORE ROKITA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
