Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Paschal-Barros v. DelPeschio et al
as 3:2022cv01275
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lamar Paschal-Barros
Defendant:
James DelPeschio, William Mulligan, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paschal-Barros v. Mental Health & Addiction Svcs et al
as 3:2021cv00700
Defendant:
Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs, Commissioner, Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lamar Paschal-Barros and Deja L. Paschal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paschal-Barros v. Doe
as 3:2019cv01606
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lamar Paschal-Barros
Defendant:
Christine Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paschal-Barros v. Gomez
as 3:2019cv01607
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lamar Paschal-Barros
Defendant:
Sue Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paschal-Barros v. Moochi et al
as 3:2019cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lamar Paschal-Barros
Defendant:
McNeil, Nick Rodriguez, Derrick Molden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paschal-Barros v. Falcone et al
as 3:2019cv00573
Defendant:
Denise Dilworth, William Fanefth, Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lamar Paschal-Barros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paschal-Barros v. Anaya et al
as 3:2019cv00740
Defendant:
Kevin Artz, Pavel Balatka, Nick Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lamar Paschal-Barros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paschal-Barros v. Dwyer et al
as 3:2019cv00696
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lamar Paschal-Barros
Defendant:
David Shepack, State of Connecticut, City of Torrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paschal-Barros v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv02157
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lamar Paschal-Barros
Defendant:
Gerald Gagne, L Pieri, Chiman Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paschal-Barros v. Kenny et al
as 3:2018cv01870
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lamar Paschal-Barros
Defendant:
Anthony Kacprzyski, Reyes, Thomas Kenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
