Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Yoquelet v. Noble County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lee Yoquelet
Defendant:
Noble County Sheriffs Department, Jenny Cummins and Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Juestel et al
as 3:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kyle Chandler
Defendant:
Marne Juestel, Kim Pflughaupt, Deanna J Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Templeton
as 3:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kyle Chandler
Defendant:
Evan J Templeton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Soto
as 3:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kyle Chandler
Defendant:
Michael Soto and J Mathey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAME v. MART et al
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
DEBORA JANE FRAME
Defendant:
RUBEN MART, KYLE GIBBONS, KRISTIE COMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORGEY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HERBERT FORGEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYNCH v. COPE et al
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
KYLE LYNCH
Defendant:
E. COPE and PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
MEGAN N. THOMPSON
Defendant:
HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, NICK SMITH, PAUL BICKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOSTER v. MCKINNEY et al
as 1:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
BRUCE E. FOSTER
Defendant:
KYLE MCKINNEY and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
