Cases 1 - 10 of 20
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC HOLDER, LORETTA LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRICKLAND v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2014cv07164
Petitioner:
DILEEF STRICKLAND
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AUSTIN v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2013cv06226
Petitioner:
HASSAN AUSTIN
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, R. SETH WILLIAMS and LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montanez v. Keller et al
as 3:2013cv02564
Plaintiff:
Domingo Colon Montanez
Defendant:
Richard Keller, Bart Josefowicz, Kevin Miskell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2013cv05456
Petitioner:
GERLD JAMES
Respondent:
BRAIN V. COLEMAN and LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KELLY v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2013cv02159
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L. KELLY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zurburg v. Evans et al
as 1:2013cv00829
Petitioner:
Branden Zurburg
Respondent:
Scott Arthur Evans, Deborah Essis Curcillo, Trevor Winguard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEELE v. KELLY
as 2:2013cv01142
Petitioner:
TYRONE PEELE
Respondent:
LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHANER v. KELLY et al
as 2:2013cv00268
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. SHANER
Defendant:
LINDA L. KELLY, JACK HENEKS, JR. and JAMES A. PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WARE v. CAMERON et al
as 1:2012cv00149
Petitioner:
TYRELL P. WARE
Respondent:
KENNETH R. CAMERON, LINDA L. KELLY and RAQUEL TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
