Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Semler v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01850
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Semler
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Brian Ninneman and Marc Zika
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berumen v. Segal et al
as 0:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Irene Berumen
Defendant:
Michael Segal, L. Linder, Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Earl L. Ward
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston and Terry Kneisel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forest v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv03716
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Forest
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Friday v. Peters et al
as 0:2023cv02870
Plaintiff:
Cleone Cecelia Friday
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian, Michael Segal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02383
Petitioner:
Freddie L. Dillard
Respondent:
State of Minnesota and Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Segal
as 0:2023cv01655
Petitioner:
Alicia L. Robinson
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
James Charles Thompson, III
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Jeff Titus, G. Besonen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. Segal
as 0:2023cv01306
Petitioner:
Shannon L. Rojas
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Talbert v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01284
Petitioner:
Jesse L. Talbert
Respondent:
Acting Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
