Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Walker v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv02345
Defendant:
C. Banish, Elizarraras, T. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Kamaron L. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Barneburg et al
as 3:2020cv06290
Plaintiff:
Kamaron L. Walker
Defendant:
Warden Jim Robertson, D. Landay, C. Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Chisman
as 3:2019cv03678
Plaintiff:
Keewin L. Walker
Defendant:
Mike Chisman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Popow et al
as 3:2019cv02944
Plaintiff:
Keewin L. Walker
Defendant:
Sergeant Spencer and M. Popow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Reid v. Walker et al
as 1:2018cv01635
Defendant:
Amanda M. Wood, Tameka L. Walker, Scott J. Van De Putte and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Donovan State Prison et al
as 3:2018cv02517
Plaintiff:
Nicholas L. Walker
Defendant:
C.O.'s Who Drove the Van, The Lady Won't Give Her Name So Nursing, C.O.'s, 3rd & 1st Watch "Bilding" #14 RJD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Charles A Williams v. John Marshall et al
as 2:2013cv01551
Defendant:
A Bollay, Dr A Bollay, Brumgarder and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A Williams
Walker v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 1:2010cv01782
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Walker
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, S. Smith, K. Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Walker
as 4:2009cv01141
Plaintiff:
Jason Saunders
Defendant:
L. Walker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Timphony L. Walker et al v. California Department of Mental Health et al
as 5:2008cv01801
Plaintiff:
Timphony L Walker, Elizabeth L Kottwitz and David Babin
Defendant:
California Department of Mental Health, Octavio Carlos Luna, Patton State Hospital Community Forensic Liaison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
