Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Janda v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2024cv01161
Defendant:
Ricardo Contreras, Lawrence Mahally, Laurel Harry and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Janda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janda v. Harry et al
as 3:2024cv01075
Defendant:
Lawrence Mahally (Retired), Jasen Bohinski, John Wetzel (Retired) and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Janda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv01316
Defendant:
Lea Martin, SCI - Dallas and Lawrence Mahally
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv01087
Defendant:
Lea Martin and Lawrence Mahally
Plaintiff:
Rubin Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mayo v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv00965
Defendant:
Dorine Varner, Carole Mattis, Robeciewski and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Alonzo Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROYSTER v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2019cv02126
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA and LAWRENCE MAHALLY
Petitioner:
TELLY ROYSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHABB v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2019cv00913
Petitioner:
SAROEUN CHABB and SAROEUN CHHAB
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, LAWRENCE MAHALLY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Papp v. Mahally et al
as 4:2019cv00347
Respondent:
Superintendent Lawrence Mahally and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Eric J. Papp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSTON v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2019cv00667
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, LAWRENCE MAHALLY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
TYRONE JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALLS v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2019cv00602
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, LAWRENCE MAHALLY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
MARWAN HALLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
