Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Long v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv01610
Plaintiff:
DeWitt Lamar Long
Defendant:
M Lopez, Unknown Quan, T Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardwell v. Thornell et al
as 4:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cardwell
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Christopher Josefowicz, Mario DeFranco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas-Damar v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv01080
Petitioner:
Lamar Douglas-Damar
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas-Damar v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2023cv00901
Plaintiff:
Lamar Douglas-Damar
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 2:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Cowan Lamar Brown
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Jeffrey Freeland and Christopher Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Waite et al
as 4:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Lamar Smith
Defendant:
S Waite, J Alexander, D Cisneros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv01076
Plaintiff:
Tywan Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, Laura M Reckart, Edward G Paine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braxton #149618 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
Chad Everett Lamar Braxton and Chad Everett Braxton
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Bond, Unknown Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price #235804 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01281
Plaintiff:
Andre Price and Andre Lamar Price
Defendant:
David Shinn and C Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2021cv00552
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Lamar Harris
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
