Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Williams v. Ortega et al
as 1:2024cv04485
Plaintiff:
Tyrie Williams
Defendant:
Elvis Ortega, Kevin Stephans, Paul Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivares Venegas v. McLean County Sheriff Office
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jonathan B Olivares Venegas
Respondent:
McLean County Sheriff Office and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Michael Crenshaw
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, . Holzer, . Edger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Chambers et al
as 1:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Bryant Hart
Defendant:
Jason Chambers, Joseph Moran, Matt Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv07178
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Lane
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Loera, Acey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyles v. Freshour et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Petitioner:
Terry L Pyles
Respondent:
Alex Freshour, Ryan Sterbing and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lane v. Loera et al
as 1:2023cv04575
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Ladell Lane
Defendant:
Loera, Acey and Valesques
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McWhorter v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv02365
Plaintiff:
Brandt McWhorter
Defendant:
Phil Martin, Josh Lane, David Poor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Lechuga et al
as 1:2023cv03311
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Ladell Lane
Defendant:
S Lechuga, E Villarreal, R Rodriguez 02 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
