Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Lane v. Dolman et al.
as 5:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
William Lane
Defendant:
Deputy Steven Dolman, Deputy Russ, Deputy Dale Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Husband v. Lane et al.
as 2:2023cv03053
Plaintiff:
Louis R Husband
Defendant:
Daniel Lane, Kevin F. Chamblin, Norm Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ludwick v. Teague et al
as 1:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Ludwick
Defendant:
Capt. Brandon Teague, C.O. Nathan Rook, C.O. Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnette v. City of Norton, et al
as 5:2022cv02342
Plaintiff:
Aaron Burnette
Defendant:
The City of Norton, Ohio, Detective Kevin Starling, Detective Ryan Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGlone v. D.R.C. Warren Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lawrence McGlone, II
Defendant:
D.R.C. Warren Correctional Institution, C.O. Shaski, C.O. Pennzki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Green et al
as 5:2021cv01377
Plaintiff:
Vincent R. Lane
Defendant:
Dave Green and Oriana House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2020cv05492
Defendant:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution, Warner and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Wainwright
as 1:2020cv00453
Respondent:
Warden Lyneal Wainwright
Petitioner:
Demario Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. Cooper et al
as 2:2019cv04592
Defendant:
Captain Sexton, C/O Knight, Ross Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Beavers et al
as 2:2019cv01793
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lane
Defendant:
C/O Beavers, Lieutenant Sexton and C/O Farmer
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
