Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Oliver v. Edmound et al
as 7:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dan Oliver
Defendant:
Warden Edmound, Unit Manager Mr. Wooden, Lt. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 7:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merchant v. Philips et al
as 7:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Pedro Bobby Merchant
Defendant:
Officer C. Philips, Warden J.C. Steeval and Mr. Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hodges v. Henry County Adult Detention Center et al
as 7:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
William Beverly Hodges, 4th
Defendant:
Henry County Adult Detention Center, Sheriff Lane Perry, Well Path Medical Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. USA
as 2:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
Kristin Lane Foster
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hodges v. Perry et al
as 7:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
William Beverly Hodges, 4th
Defendant:
Sheriff Lane Perry, Ms. Harding, Ms. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Perry et al
as 7:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Edward's, Jr. and Ronald Gene Edwards
Defendant:
Lane Perry, Officer Barker and Andrew Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Smallwood
as 3:2022cv00739
Defendant:
Smallwood and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Darrick L. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane-Bey v. Lane et al
as 7:2022cv00656
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lane-Bey, Moorish-American and Alfred Darnell Lane
Defendant:
Johnny Morrison, Cynthia P. Morrison, Melvin C. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Iwuamdi
as 3:2022cv00712
Defendant:
Officer Iwuamdi and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Darrick Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
