Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
LAYTON v. MASON et al
as 1:2022cv01814
Petitioner: Sharif Layton
Respondent: Bernadette Mason, The District Attorney Of The County Of Dauphin and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAYTON v. MASON et al
as 2:2022cv04442
Petitioner: SHARIF LAYTON
Respondent: BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. G. Clemens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01067
Plaintiff: Berlin Vanardo Brown
Defendant: CCPM G. Clemens, Parole Agent Patia, Correctional Officer Bennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAYTON v. DEFRANCISCO, et al
as 3:2020cv00077
Respondent: ALTOONA HOSPITAL, DR. LANCE C. DEFRANCISCO and JOHN/JANE DOE'S
Petitioner: MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LAYTON v. SMYTH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00519
Defendant: WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. DENISE SMYTH, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Plaintiff: MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Layton v. DeFrancisco et al
as 3:2020cv00612
Plaintiff: Maurice A. Layton
Defendant: Dr. Lance C. DeFrancisco, John/Jane Doe(s) and Altoona Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Layton v. USA
as 1:2019cv01866
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Sharif Layton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LAYTON v. PADGETT
as 2:2019cv04585
Plaintiff: JOHN LAYTON
Defendant: C/O PADGETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAYTON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00822
Defendant: WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. LANE C. DEFRANCISO, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff: MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?