Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Chesterman v. State of Montana et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Defendant:
State of Montana, Greg Gianforte, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chesterman v. Bludworth et al.
as 1:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Respondent:
Pete Bludworth and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chesterman v. Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Parole, Department of Corrections and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chesterman v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00117
Petitioner:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chesterman v. START Program et al
as 6:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Defendant:
START Program, Department of Corrections and Montana State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrus v. Bullock et al
as 9:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Steve Bullock, State of Montana, Dr. Virginia Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Mortier Barrus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maier v. Fody et al
as 6:2019cv00076
Defendant:
Alvin Fody, Bill Miller, Steve Bullock and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Scott Maier
In Re:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maier v. Guyer
as 6:2019cv00068
Respondent:
Lynn Guyer
Petitioner:
Lloyd Scott Maier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. USA
as 1:2015cv00121
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lloyd John Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maier v. Frink et al
as 4:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Scott Maier
Defendant:
Martin Frink, Ms. Christian, Ms. Wandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
