Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lofton v. Unknown
as 4:2022cv00131
Plaintiff: Robert Lofton
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lofton v. Roberson, et al.
as 4:2022cv00044
Plaintiff: Robert Lofton and Robert Vernon Lofton
Defendant: Floyd County Sheriff's Office, David Roberson and Debra McCain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWRENCE v. KEMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00073
Defendant: MEDICAL DIRECTOR BOWEN, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, LIEUTENANT KING and others
Plaintiff: ROOSEVELT LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIPP v. LOFTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00133
Defendant: DEPUTY DERRICK LOFTON, DEPUTY TOMMY HARRIS and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff: CLEVELAND NATHANIEL HIPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOFTON v. TOBY
as 4:2020cv00067
Petitioner: SCOURTERRIOUS LOFTON
Respondent: Deputy Warden Toby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOFTON v. TOBY
as 5:2020cv00073
Respondent: WARDEN TOBY
Petitioner: SCOURTERRIOUS LOFTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lofton v. Casey et al
as 4:2019cv00142
Defendant: Melanie Casey, Tim Burkaulter, Debra McCain and others
Plaintiff: Robert Vernon Lofton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2019cv00134
Defendant: Officer Kilgore and Kevin Sprayberry
Plaintiff: Daniel Eugene Lofton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Bateman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv00054
Plaintiff: Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant: Jakelia Bateman, Mrs. Brown, Mario Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. Burkhalter
as 4:2016cv00335
Petitioner: Robert Vernon Lofton
Respondent: Tim Burkhalter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?