Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Diez v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Warden Jerry Sanchez, Elbert Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice -CID
as 2:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice -CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Bryan Collier, Logan T Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Bryan Collier, Logan T Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Polk County Jail et al
as 9:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
William Logan James
Respondent:
Polk County Jail and Byron Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Polk County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv02646
Plaintiff:
William Logan James
Defendant:
Polk County Jail and Byron Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Pope et al
as 6:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Johnson, Jr., Frederick Osbey, Brandon Thomas and others
Defendant:
Warden Juaquine E Pope, Warden II Juan Garcia, Asst Warden John R. Delapp, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowery v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00047
Petitioner:
Michael Logan Lowery
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowery v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00289
Petitioner:
Michael Logan Lowery
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence v. USA
as 2:2023cv00007
Petitioner:
Logan Bailey Lawrence
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
