Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoultz v. Loy et al
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Frank Shoultz
Defendant:
Warden Loy, Dr Becker and Phil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ollie v. Ek et al
as 4:2024cv04043
Plaintiff:
Robert Ollie, Jr
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Kurt Osmundson, D Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Dodd et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Vincent M George, Jr.
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd, William Loy, Robert Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Sennings et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Dorenzo T Moore
Defendant:
Chad Sennings, Loy Williams, Dr Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharrow v. Loy et al
as 3:2023cv03702
Plaintiff:
William L. Sharrow
Defendant:
Bill Loy, Phil Marten and Wexford Health Sources Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maltbia v. Loy
as 3:2023cv03601
Plaintiff:
Kevin Maltbia
Defendant:
William Loy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loy v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
John Loy
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Sharon Coleman-Deems, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Claude et al
as 3:2023cv02451
Plaintiff:
Teon Berry
Defendant:
Dr Claude, Charles Truitt, Rachel Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
