Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Whipple v. Warden
as 2:2024cv02269
Petitioner:
Lori Whipple
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Temple v. Gibson et al
as 2:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander Temple
Defendant:
Michael Gibson, Imo Ebong, Martin Cadeiras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Marin County District Attorney et al
as 3:2022cv05557
Plaintiff:
Loureece Stone Clark
Defendant:
Marin County District Attorney, Lori Elizabeth Frugoli and Daniel L. Madow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Goldstein et al
as 3:2022cv03793
Plaintiff:
Loureece Stone Clark
Defendant:
Mark H. Goldstein, Kristen Goldstein, County of Marin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv02802
Plaintiff:
Vincent E Sanchez
Defendant:
Jennifer Dixon, Kevin Robinson, Kathy Collings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mwasi v. Blanchard et al
as 1:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
King Mwasi
Defendant:
T. Blanchard, Huu Nguyen, Urbano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Marin County et al
as 4:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Marin County, Lori Frugoli, Kelly V. Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hill v. Bowers et al
as 2:2021cv01602
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Bowers, Kathleen Allison, John Novey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Newsom et al
as 3:2021cv06339
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reed
Defendant:
Governor Gavin Newsom, Gregory J. Ahern, A. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
