Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Jackson v. Calloway et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Keith McKinley Jackson and Keith M. Knowles Jackson
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knowles v. Wells et al
as 8:2021cv01770
Plaintiff:
Louis M. Knowles
Defendant:
Rick Wells, Manatee County Sherriff's Office and Ron Desantis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDuffy v. United States Government et al
as 3:2017cv00612
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel McDuffy, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Government, State of Florida, Putnam County, FL Sheriff's Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory McKinney v. S. Hubbard, et al
as 17-15098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MCKINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
S. HUBBARD, M. KNOWLES, N. DILL and others
Len Nguyen v. M. Knowles, et al
as 11-16611
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEN NGUYEN
Respondent - Appellee:
M. KNOWLES, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ell Jones v. M. Knowles, et al
as 10-17893
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELL JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
M. KNOWLES and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Sy Castle v. M. Knowles, et al
as 10-16372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SY LEE CASTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. KNOWLES, Warden, R. FISHER, Captain, PHILLIPS, Lieutentant and others
LeGrante Ellis v. James Tilton, et al
as 10-16145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEGRANTE V. ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, P. ENRIQUEZ, Facility Captain, NORTH KERN STATE PRISON and others
Timothy Denton v. M. Knowle
as 10-16095
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY M. DENTON
Respondent - Appellee:
M. KNOWLES, Warden
Ford v. Hedgpeth et al
as 1:2010at00286
Plaintiff:
Ray Byron Ford
Defendant:
A. Hedgpeth , California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , M Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
