Cases 1 - 10 of 495
McDaniel v. Garrett et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Nicholas McDaniel
Respondent:
Timothy Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. McDaniels et al
as 2:2023cv00995
Petitioner:
John Doe
Respondent:
E.K. McDaniels and The Attorney General of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fernandez-Morales v. Currier et al
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Yoandy Fernandez-Morales
Defendant:
Currier, Hutchings, Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Devencenzi v. Tucker et al
as 3:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Robert Devencenzi
Defendant:
Tucker, Lewis, Eldon K. McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahir v. McDaniels et al
as 3:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Shane Micheal Dahir
Defendant:
E.K. McDaniels, James Cox, Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitted v. State of Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Dr. Naugh, Head Phycitist, Medical Director and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel Marie Whitted
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Gittere et al
as 3:2021cv00005
Respondent:
NDOC Warden Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Harvey DeAndre McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniels v. Gittere et al
as 3:2020cv00692
Respondent:
Warden Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Harvey DeAndre McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniels v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00623
Respondent:
Nevada Department of Corrections and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Harvey DeAndre McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00450
Defendant:
D. Jones, Nevada, State of, Warden William Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
