Cases 1 - 10 of 29
TIPTON v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
SKY TIPTON
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID CLOSE, MICHELLE IVICIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKNIGHT v. MCDOWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCKNIGHT
Defendant:
MCDOWELL and LACOMBE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. IVICIC et al
as 3:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY PERRY
Defendant:
MICHELLE IVICIC, DARREN GINTER, STEVEN BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT et al. v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al.
as 3:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR. and MICHAEL CLAYTON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KROLL v. HIGGINS et al
as 3:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. KROLL
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. HIGGINS, JR., ANTHONY ZANONI, MICHAEL O. TWIGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BOWEN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00220
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, CHAPLIN MILLER, Captain LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McDowell v. Hainesworth et al
as 3:2020cv01599
Petitioner:
Reuben McDowell
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General, The District Attorney of Lycoming County and Ms. M. Hainesworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WEIR v. SMITH et al
as 3:2020cv00127
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH WEIR
Defendant:
JOEL BARROWS, DAVID CLOSE, BRIAN KOVAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROKITA v. FARABAUGH et al
as 3:2020cv00016
Defendant:
LT. T. MCDOWELL, JOHN WETZEL, OFFICER SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
MARK C. ROKITA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
