Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kasyjanski v. Allyene et al
as 1:2024cv02278
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Defendant:
Jennifer Allyene, Kelly Lotnard, Nicole Chimenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Kasyjanski v. Fairfield County Solicitors Office et al
as 0:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
Keith Kasyjanski and Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Defendant:
Fairfield County Solicitors Office, Fairfield Law Enforcement, Fairfield County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Brown v. Oconee County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2020cv03282
Defendant:
Oconee County Sheriff's Office, Barry L Owens and David McMahan
Plaintiff:
Decota Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of John David Dellinger v. Bryant et al
as 1:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Sergeant Timothy Combs, Corporal Whitaker, Officer Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
John David Dellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Wilson et al
as 7:2017cv02425
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dean Turner
Defendant:
Alan Wilson , Ashley McMahan , Eugene Donohue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMahan v. USA
as 6:2016cv02394
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randy McMahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Abdullah-Malik v. Bryant et al
as 1:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Akeem Alim-Nafis Abdullah-Malik
Defendant:
Bruce M Bryant, James F Arwood, Richard L Martin, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Laubshire et al
as 6:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
M V Laubshire, William R Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. McMaster et al
as 4:2009cv01481
Petitioner:
Ernest Eugene Pickett
Respondent:
Henry Dargan McMaster and Ashley A McMahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMahan v. USA
as 6:2009cv70019
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randy McMahan
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
