Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Wayne Jackson v. Trump et al
as 1:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson and Artemis Adams Anderson Andersen
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Maga LLC., Proudboys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Jackson v. USA
as 23-5986
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jackson v. USA
as 5:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
Michael D. Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. Hershberger et al
as 4:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson and Artemis Adams Anderson Andersen
Defendant:
Edwin Hershberger, Mike Reed, Damon Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02181
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jackson v. United States Marshals Service
as 4:2023cv00413
Petitioner:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson
Respondent:
US Marshals Service and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Michael Jackson v. Ivy Medical, et al
as 23-35077
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL E. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
IVY MEDICAL, JUDICIAL COURTS, TWIN FALLS COUNTY JAIL and others
Jackson v. Lay, et al.
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson
Defendant:
Lonnie Lay, Tom Carter, Twin Falls County Adult Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Carter, et al.
as 1:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Jackson
Respondent:
Sheriff Tom Carter and Twin Falls County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Stitt et al
as 4:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Officer DeShields, Officer Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
