Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Clampitt v. Nanos et al
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff: Michael David Clampitt
Defendant: Chris Nanos, Unknown Mines and Global Tel-Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2019cv08183
Defendant: W.T Dixon, Mohave, County of, S Portillo and others
Plaintiff: Michael David Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Bishoff
as 3:2018cv08162
Defendant: Don Bishoff
Plaintiff: Michael David Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bjornstad v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03895
Petitioner: Michael David Bjornstad
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv04441
Plaintiff: Michael David Scott
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2016cv04093
Plaintiff: Michael David Scott
Defendant: Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tilford v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv00876
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff: Michael David Tilford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Scottsdale Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00094
Defendant: Scottsdale Police Department and Darren Hyman
Plaintiff: Michael David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02519
Defendant: Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Scottsdale City Court
Plaintiff: Michael David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sebba v. Ryan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02438
Respondent: Charles L Ryan
Petitioner: Michael David Sebba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?