Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nathan Cook v. Michael Pearce, Warden
as 15-50592
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHAN LEE COOK
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL PEARCE, Warden, Bastrop Federal Correctional Institution
Huff v. Pearce
as 2:2014cv02881
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Huff
Defendant:
Michael Pearce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cook v. Pearce
as 1:2014cv00913
Petitioner:
Nathan Lee Cook
Respondent:
Michael Pearce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richard Gonzalez v. Department of Justice, et al
as 14-50382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL PEARCE, MICHAEL SCHAPPAUGH, Health Sevices Administrator, GEO FACILITY and others
Burkett v. Pearce
as 1:2014cv00298
Petitioner:
Robert Burkett
Respondent:
Michael Pearce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv01060
Respondent:
Bastrop Federal Correctional Institution, U.S. Attorney Eric Holder and Michael Pearce
Petitioner:
Jaime Antonio Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00742
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williamson v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv00721
Defendant:
Does I through IV, Gregory Emberton, Glenn A. Fine and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff H. Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Roth v. Pearce
as 1:2013cv00524
Respondent:
Michael Pearce
Petitioner:
John Paul Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Von Schultz v. Pearce et al
as 1:2013cv00269
Respondent:
Bastrop Federal Correctional Institution and Michael Pearce
Petitioner:
Albert Wilhelm Von Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
