Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddie v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
LaRico Dwayne Gaddie, Sr.
Defendant:
David Knight, Steven Carter, Darryl Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Mills v. Green
as 6:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
John Mills
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Mills et al
as 3:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Shileka P. Hill
Defendant:
Shift Command Mills, Officer Quinnett, Officer Mondeli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Mills et al
as 5:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Shileka P. Hill
Defendant:
Shift Command Mills, Officer Quinnett, Officer Mondeli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Katenbach et al
as 5:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cole McNeal
Defendant:
Tim Katenbach, McCracken County, Jessie Riddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Timmy Wallace
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Hector Joyner, R. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nellson v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Gregory Mims, Kathryn Arrington, Philip Hlavac and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mills v. Lane et al
as 5:2019cv00374
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Mills
Defendant:
Dakota Mitchell, Ben Lane, Bourbon County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Lane et al
as 3:2019cv00586
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Mills
Defendant:
Dakota Mitchell, Ben Lane, Bourbon County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
