Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Brighton Police Chief et al
as 1:2023cv10020
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Brighton Police Chief, Brighton Police Officers 1-25 John Does, Brighton Supervising Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Massachusetts State Police et al
as 1:2022cv12235
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Chief Massachusetts State Police, State Police Officer Clark, State Police Officer John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Boston Police et al
as 1:2022cv12233
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Chief Boston Police, Boston Police Officers, John Does 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. Sununu et al
as 1:2021cv11585
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Holloway, Jr.,
Defendant:
Chris Sununu, Gordon MacDonald, John J. Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. MacDonald, Jr.
as 1:2021cv10802
Petitioner:
Jerome Turner
Respondent:
Joseph D. MacDonald, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jacobs v. Fillipi et al
as 1:2018cv11604
Defendant:
Town of Fitzwilliam, Hailey Rae, Maggie Hassan and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacDonald v. Saba et al
as 1:2016cv11430
Plaintiff:
Chester MacDonald
Defendant:
James Saba, Carol Higgins O'Brien, Paul Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloman v. Deakin et al
as 1:2014cv12594
Plaintiff:
Tajuan Holloman
Defendant:
David Deakin, Harold Clarke, James Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. MacDonald
as 1:2013cv12674
Petitioner:
Frazier Jones
Respondent:
Joseph MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
