Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Curtis Lewis v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20493
Petitioner - Appellant: CURTIS MACK LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Lewis v. Foster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00831
Petitioner: Mack Lewis
Respondent: Brian Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Stephens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv01367
Petitioner: Curtis Mack Lewis
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Livingston et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00002
Plaintiff: Curtis Mack Lewis
Defendant: Brad Livingston, D. Blackwell, Bruce W Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Baenen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00531
Petitioner: Mack Lewis
Respondent: Michael Baenen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Ellis et al
as 4:2012cv00352
Plaintiff: Curtis Mack Lewis, Sr.
Defendant: Kent Ellis and Patricia R Lykos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Lewis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-20093
Petitioner - Appellant: CURTIS MACK LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee: RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Lewis v. Thaler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv05126
Petitioner: Curtis Mack Lewis
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis Sr. v Thaler
as 4:2009cv04163
Plaintiff: Curtis Mack Lewis, SR.
Defendant: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. USA, et al
as 08-20278
Plaintiff - Appellant: CURTIS MACK LEWIS, Sorereign Corporate Curtis Mack Lewis
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R W HANKS, BURTON H REIST and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?