Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Samia v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40070
Petitioner:
Elias A. Samia
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40067
Petitioner:
Robert Gardner
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montrond v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40032
Petitioner:
Pedro Montrond
Respondent:
Superintendent Matthew J. Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leo v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40021
Petitioner:
Anthony M Leo
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barker v. Divris et al
as 1:2024cv10089
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barker
Defendant:
Matthew Divris, Anthony Findley and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Divris
as 4:2023cv40107
Petitioner:
Eduardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Superintendent Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Balcacer v. Divris
as 4:2023cv11843
Petitioner:
Jose Balcacer
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zapata v. Devris
as 4:2023cv40068
Petitioner:
Carlos Ramon Zapata
Respondent:
Matthew J. Devris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pinney v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 1:2023cv11006
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pinney, Johnathan Pinney and Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
Bridgewater State Hospital and Dr. Nikhil Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
