Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Patterson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv01153
Petitioner:
Maurice Patterson
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. Urry
as 2:2010cv00869
Plaintiff:
Maurice Patterson
Defendant:
Philip G Urry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Hilliard et al
as 2:2010cv00627
Plaintiff:
Maurice Patterson
Defendant:
Ruth H Hilliard, Maricopa County Attorney, Bruce Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv02187
Petitioner:
Maurice Patterson
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv02010
Petitioner:
Maurice Patterson
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Phoenix Risk Management Division et al
as 2:2009cv01859
Plaintiff:
Maurice Patterson
Defendant:
Phoenix Risk Management Division, Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Janette Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v Schriro,et al
as 2:2008cv02019
Petitioner:
Maurice Patterson
Respondent:
Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Patterson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv01143
Petitioner:
Maurice Patterson
Respondent:
Joe Arpaio and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Patterson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv00507
Plaintiff:
Maurice Patterson
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, B0738, B0907 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Patterson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv00234
Petitioner:
Maurice Patterson
Respondent:
Joe Arpaio and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
