Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HELENKAMP v. JONES et al
as 2:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
MALACHI HELENKAMP
Defendant:
M. JONES, J. MCCLELLAND, MS. NOVAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MCCLELLAND v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01924
Petitioner:
DAVID J. MCCLELLAND
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERTOLETTE v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
JOHN BERTOLETTE
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, LAUREL HARRY, TABB BICKELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MAYO v. ROGERS et al
as 3:2020cv00185
Defendant:
SERGEANT MCCLELLAND, CORRECTIONS OFFICER ROGERS and UNIT MANAGER TIMOTHY LITTLE
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARNES v. MEDVA et al
as 3:2019cv00202
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET SECURITY DEPT., LT. LINDSEY, CO GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
VASQUEZ v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2019cv00040
Defendant:
DAVID ONSTEAD, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, DOUGLAS ABBOTT and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
TATE v. WIGGINS et al
as 3:2018cv00230
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, ERIC TICE, JENNIFER MCCLELLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LINDELL TATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JEFFERSON v. GLUNT et al
as 1:2018cv00196
Defendant:
MS. MCCLELLAND, STEVEN GLUNT, SUPERINTENDENT TREVOR A. WINGARD and others
Plaintiff:
LARRIE D. JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GREEN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GREEN
Defendant:
WETZEL, HALLIGAN, STROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
