Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
BRAD KING
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY, MAC MCDUFFIE and WILLIAM MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRESSWELL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and MAC MCDUFFIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CAMPBELL et al v. THE COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 2:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
JOYELLE CAMPBELL and CLAYTON BOYD
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF MERCER, ERNA L. CRAIG, MAC MCDUFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDUFFIE v. VARNER et al
as 2:2021cv00161
Defendant:
SGT CURRAN, JOHN DOE #1, DORINA VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MCDUFFIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2019cv05824
Respondent:
RN, FORMER CHCA SHIRLEY LAWS-SMITH, PA-C JOHN NICHOLSON, MD BENJAMIN V. ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
SAMIRRAH MINNIS, MANDEE QUINN, MARK WAHL and others
Plaintiff:
TYREEK JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCDUFFY v. BUSH et al
as 2:2013cv03858
Petitioner:
KHALIEF MCDUFFY
Respondent:
ERIC BUSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCDUFFIE v. DUPONT et al
as 2:2008cv00055
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MCDUFFIE
Defendant:
JOSEPH DUPONT and LOUIS S. FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDUFFIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2007cv03184
Petitioner:
PHILLIP MCDUFFIE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
