Cases 1 - 10 of 23
McCord v. Sullivan County Correctional Facilty et al
as 2:2022mc00009
Plaintiff:
James C. McCord
Defendant:
Sullivan County Correctional Facilty, State of Tennessee, Polk County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. McMinn County
as 1:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Willie P Green
Defendant:
McMinn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flournoy v. McMinn County
as 1:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
Jacob Shane Flournoy
Respondent:
McMinn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locke et al v. McMinn County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Billy W. Locke, Pam Locke and Angie Thomas
Defendant:
McMinn County Jail, Securus Phone Comp., Rye Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spangler v. Baldwin Barnette et al
as 1:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaise E Spangler
Defendant:
Wendy Baldwin Barnette, Meigs County, Meigs County Authorities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sowah v. Guy et al
as 1:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Richard Sowah
Defendant:
Joe Guy, McMinn County Sheriffs Office, Lt Jason Bautsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. McMinn County Sheriffs Office
as 1:2021cv00203
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott
Defendant:
McMinn County Sheriffs Office and McMinn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Guy et al
as 3:2020cv00164
Defendant:
Tim Carver, Sheriff Joe Guy and McMinn County Sheriff Dept
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Hiwassee Mental Health et al
as 1:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Heather Conner, State, McMinn County and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jason Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. McMinn County Justice Center et al
as 1:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
Donnie Lee Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Guy, K Stansberry, Dr. Trennum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
