Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MEADOWS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00270
Petitioner: TIMOTHY MEADOWS
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TURNER v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00411
Plaintiff: CRAIG TURNER
Defendant: JOHN PLASSE, EMILY MEADOWS and VIGO COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STARKS v. MELLISA et al
as 2:2023cv00219
Plaintiff: DEVON E. STARKS
Defendant: MELLISA, SHEILA, ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCIS v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff: DONALD FRANCIS
Defendant: JOHN PLASSE, CHARLEY FUNK, CASEY LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCIS v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00113
Plaintiff: DONALD FRANCIS
Defendant: JOHN PLASSE, CHARLEY FUNK, CASEY LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Neal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00874
Plaintiff: Rolando L Diaz
Defendant: Ron D Neal, C Frediarelli, G Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEADOWS v. USA
as 1:2022cv00254
Petitioner: DONAVEN MEADOWS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ALVAREZ et al v. JEFFERSON COUNTY JAIL
as 4:2018cv00234
Plaintiff: CALEB MEADOWS, NICHOLAS MICHAEL TUCKER, KEANAN VAUGHN and others
Defendant: JEFFERSON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAYLESS v. EWING et al
as 2:2016cv00276
Defendant: P. DAVIS, EDDINGTON, GREGG EWING and others
Plaintiff: DAVID H. GRAYLESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koch v. Gregory et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00111
Plaintiff: Matthew E Koch
Defendant: Katherine Gregory, Steve Sarris, Mark E Schutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?