Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Adams #200957 v. Medrano et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Lamont M Adams
Defendant:
Unknown Medrano, Unknown Freetag, B Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valenzuela v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02293
Petitioner:
Armando Medrano Valenzuela
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gemma v. Medrano et al
as 4:2021cv00167
Defendant:
A Medrano and Unknown Othon
Plaintiff:
Michael D Gemma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Myers et al v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
Gilbert M Rivera, Gilbert Bejarano, Patrick Coty Chester and others
Defendant:
J Adam Shepherd, Gila, County of, Penni Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medrano v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00255
Defendant:
Justin Solberg, Penni Padgett, Gila, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Medrano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Lathrop et al
as 2:2020cv00822
Defendant:
William Lathrop, Dawn Montoya, Unknown Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medrano v. Winn
as 4:2015cv00038
Petitioner:
Jaime B Medrano
Respondent:
Louis W Winn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Juarez #059410 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv02708
Plaintiff:
Manuel Isidro Juarez
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Van Winkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medrano v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2014cv02461
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Raul Melquiades Medrano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medrano v. United States Parole Commission
as 4:2014cv02294
Petitioner:
Jaime B Medrano
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
