Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Cody v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Contrell Deandre Cody
Defendant:
Mitch Daniels, Ron Neal and Eric Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CODY v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
CONTRELL DEANDRE CODY
Defendant:
MITCH DANIELS, RON NEAL and ERIC HOLCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoglund v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2017cv00824
Plaintiff:
Keith Hoglund
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Edgar D Whitcomb, Mitch Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CABLE v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2017cv03959
Defendant:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, ARAMARK, BOARD OF EDUCATION and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES CABLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIZANO v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2012cv01393
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, COUNTY OF LAKE, MITCH DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
ALVINO PIZANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2012cv00947
Defendant:
MITCH DANIELS and BRUCE LEMMON
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonds v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2011cv00312
Plaintiff:
William Edmonds
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Mitch Daniels, Bruce Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Trotter et al
as 3:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
Oasia Barnes
Defendant:
Delray Trotter, Wayne Peoples, Bill Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Rivera v. Mitch Daniels, et al
as 10-3622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCH DANIELS, Governor, STEVE CARTER, Attorney General, TIM BERRY, Treasurer and others
WHITLOCK v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2010cv00802
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, MITCH DANIELS, BRUCE C. LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
FLOYD E. WHITLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
