Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Moran v. Pennsylvania et al
as 5:2018cv02291
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WILLIAM MORAN
Defendant:
CLERK OF COURT BERKS COUNTY, COURT CLERK and BOSSIER POLICE DEPT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORAN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv04081
Petitioner:
FRED MORAN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RIECO v. MORAN et al
as 2:2014cv00588
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MORAN, SMITH, GUSKIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
JAMIL SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, R. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. One or More Unknown Named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, et al
as 1:2013cv01357
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
One or More Unknown named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, 50 John/Jane Does, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MERRITT v. BOLMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00959
Plaintiff:
DAVID MERRITT
Defendant:
BOLMAN, FARLEY, JP NAJEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIQUEZ v. SELELLO et al
as 2:2012cv00924
Plaintiff:
HERIBERTO RODRIQUEZ
Defendant:
SELELLO, BAKIN, MCCLOSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peraza v. Cain et al
as 3:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
Paul Peraza
Defendant:
Thomas Cain, Harrell Watts, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RICHARDSON v. CRAWFORD COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2010cv00275
Plaintiff:
GARY L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, TIM L. LEWIS, KENNETH SAULSBERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. COUNTY OF CRAWFORD et al
as 1:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
RONALD A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CRAWFORD, FRANCIS J. SCHULTZ, TIM LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
