Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Meyers v. Reidinger et al
as 3:2023cv00812
Defendant:
David Meyers, Martin Reidinger, Graham Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherenfant v. FCC Butner Wardens et al
as 5:2023ct03023
Plaintiff:
Nertant Cherenfant
Defendant:
FCC Butner Wardens, FCI 2 Butner, Warden Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morrison v. Evans et al
as 5:2022ct03407
Plaintiff:
Randolph Morrison
Defendant:
Dr. Charlotte Ann Evans, Nurse Rhonna Medlin, Kendell Mullens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Millsaps v. Mullen et al
as 5:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Marvin W. Millsaps
Defendant:
Jason Todd Mullen, C. E. James, A. Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Everett et al
as 5:2022ct03255
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Hardin
Defendant:
D. Everett, Captain Turley, C/O Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Truesdale v. Cacheris et al
as 3:2017cv00665
Plaintiff:
Adam I.L. Truesdale
Defendant:
James C Cacheris , Graham C Mullen , Kenneth M Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullen v. Jones et al
as 5:2017ct03090
Plaintiff:
Darryl Kevin Mullen, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Jones, Marcus Sharpe and Medical Staff Tylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. Foster et al
as 1:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Rick Foster, Max O. Cogburn, Scott D Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. U.S. Federal Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Department of Correction, Lacey Thornburg, Charles McKeller and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. Cogburn et al
as 1:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Max Cogburn, Jr., Frank D. Whitney, Graham C. Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
