Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Murray v. YesCare, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02706
Plaintiff:
Calvin C. Murray and Calvin Coolidge Murray, III
Defendant:
YesCare, Inc., Eastern Correctional Institution, R.N. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv01094
Petitioner:
George Murray
Respondent:
Jeff Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murray v. Sgt. Hennin et al
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Calvin, III Murray
Defendant:
Sgt. Hennin, Lt. W. Bunn, Lt. Dabiri and others
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Maryland Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jerry Brown
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Corrections, Parry Murray, Nancy K. Kopp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Foxwell et al
as 8:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Chris Cavins, J. Bromley, Rita Mariner and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Murray v. Warden et al
as 8:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Sgt. Norkelun, Sgt. Stevenson and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin C. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Melvin v. Stulis et al
as 1:2019cv03431
Defendant:
Carolyn Murray, Officer Mrs. Vernusa Pace, Warden Ms. Tina Stulis and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Melvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Memarsadeghi et al
as 8:2018cv03728
Plaintiff:
Chris Murray
Defendant:
Dr. Mahboobeh Memarsadeghi and Wexford Health Sources, INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Murray v. DPSCS-CIT et al
as 1:2018cv03442
Defendant:
SOG and DPSCS-CIT
Plaintiff:
Tyler W. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Murray v. Warden
as 8:2017cv03779
Plaintiff:
Calvin C Murray, III
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
