Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SMITH v. CLARK
as 1:2022cv00220
Petitioner:
WAYNE N. SMITH, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DELOATCH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01521
Plaintiff:
SEAN DELOATCH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTT v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridge v. Giglio et al
as 3:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
Luther T. Ridge, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael A. Giglio, Larry R. Snyder, Jorge E. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMEY v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2015cv01461
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, JOHN A. REILLY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMEY v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2015cv01431
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, JOHN A. REILLY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. LEVI
as 2:2007cv04568
Petitioner:
TYRONE N. SMITH
Respondent:
TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
