Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Smith v. USA
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Nathan E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gardner v. Precythe et al
as 2:2024cv04023
Plaintiff:
Nathan Gardner
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Brock Van Loo, Aaron Joy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dutcher v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Dutcher
Defendant:
Anne Precythe, Jason Lewis, Travis Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Department of Correction et al
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Nathan Leroy Hicks
Defendant:
Department of Correction and C.O. on Duty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Downing et al
as 4:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Harmon
Defendant:
Alexander L. Downing, Unknown Wells, Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv06097
Plaintiff:
Prince Bossalinie and Nathan Caldwell
Defendant:
Rich Smith, Beverly Baker and Jessica Ballinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glidewell v. Bradley et al
as 2:2023cv04131
Plaintiff:
Shawn Alan Glidewell
Defendant:
Johnathon Bradley, Nathan Lexa, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Nathan Waibl, Unknown Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillinger v. USA
as 1:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
Nathan P. Dillinger
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hicks v. Pettigrew
as 4:2023cv00384
Petitioner:
Nathan Leroy Hicks
Respondent:
Shawn Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
